anova and multiple comparison tests Search Results


90
GraphPad Software Inc kruskal-wallis test of one-way anova (nonparametric) using dunnett’s multiple comparisons test
Kruskal Wallis Test Of One Way Anova (Nonparametric) Using Dunnett’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/kruskal-wallis test of one-way anova (nonparametric) using dunnett’s multiple comparisons test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
kruskal-wallis test of one-way anova (nonparametric) using dunnett’s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc one-way anova with spherical data and tukey’s multiple tests
One Way Anova With Spherical Data And Tukey’s Multiple Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/one-way anova with spherical data and tukey’s multiple tests/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
one-way anova with spherical data and tukey’s multiple tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc anova technique and dunnett’s post hoc multiple comparative test
Anova Technique And Dunnett’s Post Hoc Multiple Comparative Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anova technique and dunnett’s post hoc multiple comparative test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova technique and dunnett’s post hoc multiple comparative test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc ordinary one-way anova with sıdakʼs or dunnett’s multiple comparison tests
A) Representative images of samples after post-treatment. B-E) Post-treatment with solvents or acids influences the B) elastic modulus, C) volumetric swelling (percentage relative to as-fabricated hydrogels, without treatment), D) water fraction and E) electronic conductivity of hydrogels. F-G) X-ray S 2p photoelectron spectra of treated and as-fabricated hydrogels indicates a decrease in PSS after all treatments. The de-convoluted profiles were fitted with asymmetric functions. Mean and standard deviation presented. Quantification of PSS/PEDOT ratio calculated from a comparison of the area under the curves of the XPS fits. N≥4. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. H) Pearson’s correlation heatmap showing the correlation between PSS/PEDOT ratio (P), water fraction (W), elastic modulus (M) and conductivity (C). I) Survey of recent literature that report modulus and conductivity of 3D printed PEDOT:PSS hydrogels. High conductivity often leads to stiffness values outside the physiological range. The present study joins very few others able to meet satisfactory conductivity with elastic moduli representing soft tissues.
Ordinary One Way Anova With Sıdakʼs Or Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ordinary one-way anova with sıdakʼs or dunnett’s multiple comparison tests/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ordinary one-way anova with sıdakʼs or dunnett’s multiple comparison tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc anova mixed-effects model and tukey’s multiple comparison test
A) Representative images of samples after post-treatment. B-E) Post-treatment with solvents or acids influences the B) elastic modulus, C) volumetric swelling (percentage relative to as-fabricated hydrogels, without treatment), D) water fraction and E) electronic conductivity of hydrogels. F-G) X-ray S 2p photoelectron spectra of treated and as-fabricated hydrogels indicates a decrease in PSS after all treatments. The de-convoluted profiles were fitted with asymmetric functions. Mean and standard deviation presented. Quantification of PSS/PEDOT ratio calculated from a comparison of the area under the curves of the XPS fits. N≥4. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. H) Pearson’s correlation heatmap showing the correlation between PSS/PEDOT ratio (P), water fraction (W), elastic modulus (M) and conductivity (C). I) Survey of recent literature that report modulus and conductivity of 3D printed PEDOT:PSS hydrogels. High conductivity often leads to stiffness values outside the physiological range. The present study joins very few others able to meet satisfactory conductivity with elastic moduli representing soft tissues.
Anova Mixed Effects Model And Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anova mixed-effects model and tukey’s multiple comparison test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova mixed-effects model and tukey’s multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc student’s t-test or one-way anova followed by dunnett’s multiple comparison test
A) Representative images of samples after post-treatment. B-E) Post-treatment with solvents or acids influences the B) elastic modulus, C) volumetric swelling (percentage relative to as-fabricated hydrogels, without treatment), D) water fraction and E) electronic conductivity of hydrogels. F-G) X-ray S 2p photoelectron spectra of treated and as-fabricated hydrogels indicates a decrease in PSS after all treatments. The de-convoluted profiles were fitted with asymmetric functions. Mean and standard deviation presented. Quantification of PSS/PEDOT ratio calculated from a comparison of the area under the curves of the XPS fits. N≥4. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. H) Pearson’s correlation heatmap showing the correlation between PSS/PEDOT ratio (P), water fraction (W), elastic modulus (M) and conductivity (C). I) Survey of recent literature that report modulus and conductivity of 3D printed PEDOT:PSS hydrogels. High conductivity often leads to stiffness values outside the physiological range. The present study joins very few others able to meet satisfactory conductivity with elastic moduli representing soft tissues.
Student’s T Test Or One Way Anova Followed By Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/student’s t-test or one-way anova followed by dunnett’s multiple comparison test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
student’s t-test or one-way anova followed by dunnett’s multiple comparison test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc repeated measures anova tests followed by bonferroni’s multiple comparison test graphpad prism; graphpad software version 4
A) Representative images of samples after post-treatment. B-E) Post-treatment with solvents or acids influences the B) elastic modulus, C) volumetric swelling (percentage relative to as-fabricated hydrogels, without treatment), D) water fraction and E) electronic conductivity of hydrogels. F-G) X-ray S 2p photoelectron spectra of treated and as-fabricated hydrogels indicates a decrease in PSS after all treatments. The de-convoluted profiles were fitted with asymmetric functions. Mean and standard deviation presented. Quantification of PSS/PEDOT ratio calculated from a comparison of the area under the curves of the XPS fits. N≥4. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. H) Pearson’s correlation heatmap showing the correlation between PSS/PEDOT ratio (P), water fraction (W), elastic modulus (M) and conductivity (C). I) Survey of recent literature that report modulus and conductivity of 3D printed PEDOT:PSS hydrogels. High conductivity often leads to stiffness values outside the physiological range. The present study joins very few others able to meet satisfactory conductivity with elastic moduli representing soft tissues.
Repeated Measures Anova Tests Followed By Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test Graphpad Prism; Graphpad Software Version 4, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/repeated measures anova tests followed by bonferroni’s multiple comparison test graphpad prism; graphpad software version 4/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
repeated measures anova tests followed by bonferroni’s multiple comparison test graphpad prism; graphpad software version 4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
statpoint inc anova and multiple comparisons
A) Representative images of samples after post-treatment. B-E) Post-treatment with solvents or acids influences the B) elastic modulus, C) volumetric swelling (percentage relative to as-fabricated hydrogels, without treatment), D) water fraction and E) electronic conductivity of hydrogels. F-G) X-ray S 2p photoelectron spectra of treated and as-fabricated hydrogels indicates a decrease in PSS after all treatments. The de-convoluted profiles were fitted with asymmetric functions. Mean and standard deviation presented. Quantification of PSS/PEDOT ratio calculated from a comparison of the area under the curves of the XPS fits. N≥4. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. H) Pearson’s correlation heatmap showing the correlation between PSS/PEDOT ratio (P), water fraction (W), elastic modulus (M) and conductivity (C). I) Survey of recent literature that report modulus and conductivity of 3D printed PEDOT:PSS hydrogels. High conductivity often leads to stiffness values outside the physiological range. The present study joins very few others able to meet satisfactory conductivity with elastic moduli representing soft tissues.
Anova And Multiple Comparisons, supplied by statpoint inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anova and multiple comparisons/product/statpoint inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova and multiple comparisons - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc ordinary two-way anova with dunnett’s multiple comparison test graphpad prism 6
Immunization of BALB/c mice with TERT DNA, TERT variant with a C-terminal hemagglutinin tag (TERT-HA DNA), and empty vector followed by booster immunization with given plasmids mixed with DNA encoding firefly luciferase (Luc DNA), with follow up of luciferase expression by in vivo imaging. Scheme of the immunization ( A ); results of in vivo bioluminescence imaging of booster sites at days 1–12 post injection, example of 3 mice—one from TERT, one from TERT-HA, and one from empty vector group ( B ); dynamics of bioluminescence signal change in TERT, TERT-HA DNA, and empty vector-immunized mice on days 1–12 post booster injection; each line of different colors corresponds to one site of injection (two per mouse) ( C ); relative average level of bioluminescence signal for each group on days 1 to 12 post booster injection ( D ). Bioluminescence signal is represented by the total flux from site of immunization, mean ± SD. Analyzed by ordinary two-way ANOVA with <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparison test, ** − p < 0.01; **** − p < 0.0001; ns—not significant.
Ordinary Two Way Anova With Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test Graphpad Prism 6, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ordinary two-way anova with dunnett’s multiple comparison test graphpad prism 6/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ordinary two-way anova with dunnett’s multiple comparison test graphpad prism 6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc anova by kruskal-wallis test with multiple comparisons in graphpad prism 6 software
Immunization of BALB/c mice with TERT DNA, TERT variant with a C-terminal hemagglutinin tag (TERT-HA DNA), and empty vector followed by booster immunization with given plasmids mixed with DNA encoding firefly luciferase (Luc DNA), with follow up of luciferase expression by in vivo imaging. Scheme of the immunization ( A ); results of in vivo bioluminescence imaging of booster sites at days 1–12 post injection, example of 3 mice—one from TERT, one from TERT-HA, and one from empty vector group ( B ); dynamics of bioluminescence signal change in TERT, TERT-HA DNA, and empty vector-immunized mice on days 1–12 post booster injection; each line of different colors corresponds to one site of injection (two per mouse) ( C ); relative average level of bioluminescence signal for each group on days 1 to 12 post booster injection ( D ). Bioluminescence signal is represented by the total flux from site of immunization, mean ± SD. Analyzed by ordinary two-way ANOVA with <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparison test, ** − p < 0.01; **** − p < 0.0001; ns—not significant.
Anova By Kruskal Wallis Test With Multiple Comparisons In Graphpad Prism 6 Software, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anova by kruskal-wallis test with multiple comparisons in graphpad prism 6 software/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova by kruskal-wallis test with multiple comparisons in graphpad prism 6 software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests
Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < <t>0.001).</t> <t>Kruskal-Wallis</t> multiple comparison test and <t>Dunn’s</t> post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.
Anova And Tukey Kramer Multiple Comparison Tests, Kruskal Wallis And Dunn’s Post Test, Log Rank Tests, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anova and tukey-kramer multiple comparison tests, kruskal-wallis and dunn’s post-test, log-rank tests - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc prism 7 one-way anova with dunnett’s multiple comparisons test
Production of NO during wound healing and regeneration. ( a ) Control embryos at stage 26 were injured using a needle, or tails of tadpoles at stage 41 were amputated and incubated in media with DAF-2DA solution for 15 minutes, fixed and imaged. ( b ) NO is produced in the first two layers of cells around wound edge (Scale bar = 20 μm). ( c , d ) NO is produced mainly during first 15 minutes after injury in embryos at stage 26 (Scale bar = 100 μm, five replicates, mean with standard deviation, One-way ANOVA <t>Dunnett’s</t> multiple comparisons test) ( e , f ) and after amputation in embryos at stage 41. (Scale bars = 200 μm, three replicates, mean with standard deviation, One-way ANOVA Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) ( g ) NO is not produced after injury at stage 1 and stage 5, but NO is produced after injury at stage 8 (blastula), stage 11 (gastrula), stage 14 (early neurula) and stage 20 (late neurula) (Scale bar = 500 μm). CTF – corrected total fluorescence, RFU – relative fluorescent unit, pw – post wounding, pa – post amputation **** - p < .0001, * - p < .05, n.s. - p > .05
Prism 7 One Way Anova With Dunnett’s Multiple Comparisons Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/prism 7 one-way anova with dunnett’s multiple comparisons test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
prism 7 one-way anova with dunnett’s multiple comparisons test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A) Representative images of samples after post-treatment. B-E) Post-treatment with solvents or acids influences the B) elastic modulus, C) volumetric swelling (percentage relative to as-fabricated hydrogels, without treatment), D) water fraction and E) electronic conductivity of hydrogels. F-G) X-ray S 2p photoelectron spectra of treated and as-fabricated hydrogels indicates a decrease in PSS after all treatments. The de-convoluted profiles were fitted with asymmetric functions. Mean and standard deviation presented. Quantification of PSS/PEDOT ratio calculated from a comparison of the area under the curves of the XPS fits. N≥4. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. H) Pearson’s correlation heatmap showing the correlation between PSS/PEDOT ratio (P), water fraction (W), elastic modulus (M) and conductivity (C). I) Survey of recent literature that report modulus and conductivity of 3D printed PEDOT:PSS hydrogels. High conductivity often leads to stiffness values outside the physiological range. The present study joins very few others able to meet satisfactory conductivity with elastic moduli representing soft tissues.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: 3D printed bioelectronic scaffolds with soft tissue-like stiffness

doi: 10.1101/2024.07.19.604334

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Representative images of samples after post-treatment. B-E) Post-treatment with solvents or acids influences the B) elastic modulus, C) volumetric swelling (percentage relative to as-fabricated hydrogels, without treatment), D) water fraction and E) electronic conductivity of hydrogels. F-G) X-ray S 2p photoelectron spectra of treated and as-fabricated hydrogels indicates a decrease in PSS after all treatments. The de-convoluted profiles were fitted with asymmetric functions. Mean and standard deviation presented. Quantification of PSS/PEDOT ratio calculated from a comparison of the area under the curves of the XPS fits. N≥4. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. H) Pearson’s correlation heatmap showing the correlation between PSS/PEDOT ratio (P), water fraction (W), elastic modulus (M) and conductivity (C). I) Survey of recent literature that report modulus and conductivity of 3D printed PEDOT:PSS hydrogels. High conductivity often leads to stiffness values outside the physiological range. The present study joins very few others able to meet satisfactory conductivity with elastic moduli representing soft tissues.

Article Snippet: For statistical analysis, ordinary one-way ANOVA with Sıdak’s or Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests were performed with GraphPad Prism.

Techniques: Standard Deviation, Comparison

A) Representative strain amplitude sweep of treated and untreated hydrogels to determine the storage modulus (10 rad⋅s -1 , 25 °C). B) Storage modulus obtained from A. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. C) Post-treatment causes a decrease in dimensions. The shrinkage occurs nearly isotopically ( xy/z = 0.94 – 1.16). N≥4. Mean and standard deviation presented.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: 3D printed bioelectronic scaffolds with soft tissue-like stiffness

doi: 10.1101/2024.07.19.604334

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Representative strain amplitude sweep of treated and untreated hydrogels to determine the storage modulus (10 rad⋅s -1 , 25 °C). B) Storage modulus obtained from A. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test performed. ****P≤0.0001, ***P≤0.001, **P≤0.01, *P≤0.05, Non-Significant (NS) P>0.05. C) Post-treatment causes a decrease in dimensions. The shrinkage occurs nearly isotopically ( xy/z = 0.94 – 1.16). N≥4. Mean and standard deviation presented.

Article Snippet: For statistical analysis, ordinary one-way ANOVA with Sıdak’s or Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests were performed with GraphPad Prism.

Techniques: Comparison, Standard Deviation

Immunization of BALB/c mice with TERT DNA, TERT variant with a C-terminal hemagglutinin tag (TERT-HA DNA), and empty vector followed by booster immunization with given plasmids mixed with DNA encoding firefly luciferase (Luc DNA), with follow up of luciferase expression by in vivo imaging. Scheme of the immunization ( A ); results of in vivo bioluminescence imaging of booster sites at days 1–12 post injection, example of 3 mice—one from TERT, one from TERT-HA, and one from empty vector group ( B ); dynamics of bioluminescence signal change in TERT, TERT-HA DNA, and empty vector-immunized mice on days 1–12 post booster injection; each line of different colors corresponds to one site of injection (two per mouse) ( C ); relative average level of bioluminescence signal for each group on days 1 to 12 post booster injection ( D ). Bioluminescence signal is represented by the total flux from site of immunization, mean ± SD. Analyzed by ordinary two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, ** − p < 0.01; **** − p < 0.0001; ns—not significant.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Expression of the Reverse Transcriptase Domain of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Induces Lytic Cellular Response in DNA-Immunized Mice and Limits Tumorigenic and Metastatic Potential of Murine Adenocarcinoma 4T1 Cells

doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020318

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunization of BALB/c mice with TERT DNA, TERT variant with a C-terminal hemagglutinin tag (TERT-HA DNA), and empty vector followed by booster immunization with given plasmids mixed with DNA encoding firefly luciferase (Luc DNA), with follow up of luciferase expression by in vivo imaging. Scheme of the immunization ( A ); results of in vivo bioluminescence imaging of booster sites at days 1–12 post injection, example of 3 mice—one from TERT, one from TERT-HA, and one from empty vector group ( B ); dynamics of bioluminescence signal change in TERT, TERT-HA DNA, and empty vector-immunized mice on days 1–12 post booster injection; each line of different colors corresponds to one site of injection (two per mouse) ( C ); relative average level of bioluminescence signal for each group on days 1 to 12 post booster injection ( D ). Bioluminescence signal is represented by the total flux from site of immunization, mean ± SD. Analyzed by ordinary two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, ** − p < 0.01; **** − p < 0.0001; ns—not significant.

Article Snippet: Total photon flux from the site of coinjection of TERT DNA or TERT-HA DNA and Luc DNA was compared using ordinary two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism 6, San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Variant Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Luciferase, Expressing, In Vivo Imaging, In Vivo, Imaging, Injection, Comparison

Generation of tumors by 4T1luc2 clones expressing rtTERT. Tumor growth rate was assessed using total fluorescence signal from the site of injection of 2500 ( A ), 5000 ( B ), and 10,000 ( C ) cells. Tumor volume was evaluated by total fluorescence signal from the site of cell injection by day 16 ( D ) or by calipering at day 21 ( E ). Histochemical characterization of the solid tumors formed by the parental 4T1luc2 cells ( F ) and their derivatives expressing rtTERT 4T1luc2_rtTERT_C6 ( G ); 4T1luc2_rtTERT_H9 ( H ) after ectopic implantation into BALB/c mice (H&E staining, magnification 200×). Results of tumor growth ( A – C ) were analyzed using RM two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Data on tumor volumes ( D , E ) were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns—not significant.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Expression of the Reverse Transcriptase Domain of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Induces Lytic Cellular Response in DNA-Immunized Mice and Limits Tumorigenic and Metastatic Potential of Murine Adenocarcinoma 4T1 Cells

doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020318

Figure Lengend Snippet: Generation of tumors by 4T1luc2 clones expressing rtTERT. Tumor growth rate was assessed using total fluorescence signal from the site of injection of 2500 ( A ), 5000 ( B ), and 10,000 ( C ) cells. Tumor volume was evaluated by total fluorescence signal from the site of cell injection by day 16 ( D ) or by calipering at day 21 ( E ). Histochemical characterization of the solid tumors formed by the parental 4T1luc2 cells ( F ) and their derivatives expressing rtTERT 4T1luc2_rtTERT_C6 ( G ); 4T1luc2_rtTERT_H9 ( H ) after ectopic implantation into BALB/c mice (H&E staining, magnification 200×). Results of tumor growth ( A – C ) were analyzed using RM two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Data on tumor volumes ( D , E ) were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns—not significant.

Article Snippet: Total photon flux from the site of coinjection of TERT DNA or TERT-HA DNA and Luc DNA was compared using ordinary two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism 6, San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Clone Assay, Expressing, Fluorescence, Injection, Staining, Comparison

Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < 0.001). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tumor growth assessment: data for each time-point in mm 3 are mean ± SEM. ( A ) M-234p, N = 6/group; Day 21: Control (600.96 ± 93) vs Cy+Los (20.96 ± 9.01) ( P < 0.05); ( B ) M-406, N = 6–7/group; Day 17: Control (1397.00 ± 328.32) vs Cy (372.00 ± 55.25) ( P < 0.01), vs Los (451.07 ± 143.94) ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los (123.43 ± 45.71) ( P < 0.001). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier), Median Survival (MS): ( C ) M-234p, N = 5–6/group; Control (MS: 34 days); Cy (MS: 47 days); Los (MS: 32 days); Cy+Los (MS: undefined, Day 32: 60% [3/5] complete tumor regressions). Cy+Los vs Control, vs Los, vs Cy ( P < 0.01); ( D ) M-406, N = 6–7/group); Control (MS: 24 days); Cy (MS: 36.5 days); Los (MS: 33 days); Cy+Los (MS: 47 days). Control vs Cy ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001); Cy+Los vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Los ( P < 0,001). Log-rank Test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Proliferation: Ki67 + cells/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01); ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05; ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406, representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification. Apoptosis: TUNEL + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05): ( F ) M-406 N. S; Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test; ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Proliferation: Ki67 + cells/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01); ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05; ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406, representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification. Apoptosis: TUNEL + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05): ( F ) M-406 N. S; Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test; ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 1000× magnification.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, TUNEL Assay, Comparison

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) representative tumor sections from M-234p and M-406, 400×. In both models the behavior was similar. Control group: ( A ) M-234p and ( C ) M-406: capillaries with small endothelial cells with barely stained nuclei and intercellular gaps (yellow arrow), lack of pericytes or cells with structure and staining compatible with pericytes. Cy+Los group: ( B ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406: intra- and peritumoral capillaries with structure and morphology similar to normal tissues. Endothelial cells with defined nuclei provide a continuous uninterrupted lining (yellow arrow), and well defined basal membrane covered with pericytes (red arrow). M-406 magnified section (1000×): vessel with normal vascular morphology. HIF1α expression: HIF1α + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), ( F ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05), ( G ) and H ), representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) representative tumor sections from M-234p and M-406, 400×. In both models the behavior was similar. Control group: ( A ) M-234p and ( C ) M-406: capillaries with small endothelial cells with barely stained nuclei and intercellular gaps (yellow arrow), lack of pericytes or cells with structure and staining compatible with pericytes. Cy+Los group: ( B ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406: intra- and peritumoral capillaries with structure and morphology similar to normal tissues. Endothelial cells with defined nuclei provide a continuous uninterrupted lining (yellow arrow), and well defined basal membrane covered with pericytes (red arrow). M-406 magnified section (1000×): vessel with normal vascular morphology. HIF1α expression: HIF1α + cells/field (median, range). ( E ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), ( F ) Control vs Cy ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.05), ( G ) and H ), representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Staining, Membrane, Expressing, Comparison

M-234p: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, N. S. ( D ) Th17 cells, N. S. M-406: ( E ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( F ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( G ) Treg cells, ( P = 0.064). ( H ) Th17 cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P = 0.0580). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: M-234p: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, N. S. ( D ) Th17 cells, N. S. M-406: ( E ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( F ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( G ) Treg cells, ( P = 0.064). ( H ) Th17 cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P = 0.0580). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Lymphocytes/field (median, range). M-234p: ( A ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( C ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Los, P < 0.05, vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( D – F ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification; M-406: ( G ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( H ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( I ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( J – L ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lymphocytes/field (median, range). M-234p: ( A ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( C ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Los, P < 0.05, vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( D – F ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification; M-406: ( G ) CD4 + cells, N. S. ( H ) CD8 + cells, N. S. ( I ) Foxp3 + cells: Control vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.05); ( J – L ) representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Quantification of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by flow cytometry: M-234p, day 42, Cy vs Cy+Los: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, ( P < 0.001). ( D ) Th17 cells, ( P < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post -test.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by flow cytometry: M-234p, day 42, Cy vs Cy+Los: ( A ) CD4 cells, N. S. ( B ) CD8 cells, N. S. ( C ) Treg cells, ( P < 0.001). ( D ) Th17 cells, ( P < 0.05). Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post -test.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Comparison

αSMA : % of αSMA + area/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Los, ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.01). ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy, ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001). ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Collagen : % of collagen area/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01). ( F ) M-406 N. S. ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification.

Journal: Oncotarget

Article Title: Losartan improves the therapeutic effect of metronomic cyclophosphamide in triple negative mammary cancer models

doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27694

Figure Lengend Snippet: αSMA : % of αSMA + area/field (median, range). ( A ) M-234p Control vs Los, ( P < 0.05), vs Cy+Los, ( P < 0.01). ( B ) M-406 Control vs Cy, ( P < 0.01), vs Los ( P < 0.01), vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.001). ( C ) M-234p and ( D ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification. Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison test and Dunn’s post-test. Collagen : % of collagen area/field (median, range). ( E ) M-234p Control vs Cy+Los ( P < 0.01). ( F ) M-406 N. S. ( G ) M-234p and ( H ) M-406 representative images of Control and Cy+Los treated tumors, 100× magnification.

Article Snippet: Data obtained was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparison tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test, and Log-rank tests were used to examine the differences between groups with GraphPad Prism version 3.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Techniques: Control, Comparison

Production of NO during wound healing and regeneration. ( a ) Control embryos at stage 26 were injured using a needle, or tails of tadpoles at stage 41 were amputated and incubated in media with DAF-2DA solution for 15 minutes, fixed and imaged. ( b ) NO is produced in the first two layers of cells around wound edge (Scale bar = 20 μm). ( c , d ) NO is produced mainly during first 15 minutes after injury in embryos at stage 26 (Scale bar = 100 μm, five replicates, mean with standard deviation, One-way ANOVA Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) ( e , f ) and after amputation in embryos at stage 41. (Scale bars = 200 μm, three replicates, mean with standard deviation, One-way ANOVA Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) ( g ) NO is not produced after injury at stage 1 and stage 5, but NO is produced after injury at stage 8 (blastula), stage 11 (gastrula), stage 14 (early neurula) and stage 20 (late neurula) (Scale bar = 500 μm). CTF – corrected total fluorescence, RFU – relative fluorescent unit, pw – post wounding, pa – post amputation **** - p < .0001, * - p < .05, n.s. - p > .05

Journal: BMC Genomics

Article Title: The role of nitric oxide during embryonic wound healing

doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6147-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Production of NO during wound healing and regeneration. ( a ) Control embryos at stage 26 were injured using a needle, or tails of tadpoles at stage 41 were amputated and incubated in media with DAF-2DA solution for 15 minutes, fixed and imaged. ( b ) NO is produced in the first two layers of cells around wound edge (Scale bar = 20 μm). ( c , d ) NO is produced mainly during first 15 minutes after injury in embryos at stage 26 (Scale bar = 100 μm, five replicates, mean with standard deviation, One-way ANOVA Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) ( e , f ) and after amputation in embryos at stage 41. (Scale bars = 200 μm, three replicates, mean with standard deviation, One-way ANOVA Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test) ( g ) NO is not produced after injury at stage 1 and stage 5, but NO is produced after injury at stage 8 (blastula), stage 11 (gastrula), stage 14 (early neurula) and stage 20 (late neurula) (Scale bar = 500 μm). CTF – corrected total fluorescence, RFU – relative fluorescent unit, pw – post wounding, pa – post amputation **** - p < .0001, * - p < .05, n.s. - p > .05

Article Snippet: The statistical significance was calculated relative to the control using GraphPad Prism 7 One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Techniques: Control, Incubation, Produced, Standard Deviation, Fluorescence

Changes in gene expression during wound healing after inhibition of NO production. ( a ) Graphical description of RNA-Seq experiment comparing control and NO inhibited embryonic wound healing. Only the part marked by red rectangle was collected and used for RNA isolation and sequencing. ( b - g ) DEGs, which were identified in RNA-Seq, were grouped based on their expression profile relatively to 0 minutes and GO analysis was performed. ( b , d , f ) Expression profiles of genes are representative of the z-score of the regularized log transformation of the normalized counts. ( c , e , g ) Genes with annotation and human homolog were used for GO analysis. Numbers of analysed genes are in the table together with the representative GO terms for each group. ( h ) RNA-Seq result of lep expression was verified ( i ) using RT-qPCR, separately for nos1 -MO and nos3 -MO. ( j ) Similarly, RNA-Seq result of fos expression was verified using ( k ) RT-qPCR (data are normalized to 0 minutes pw in controls, three replicates, geometric mean with geometric standard deviation, two-sided t-test from log2 values of relative expression between inhibited samples and control in 120 minutes pw), and ( l ) in situ hybridization. Site of injury is marked with a star and the signal where fos is expressed is circled by dot line (Scale bar = 100 μm) (M) Intensity of blue signal around site of injury were measured (one-way Anova, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, minimum 8 replicates). **** - p < .0001, ** - p < .01, * - p < .05, n.s. - p > .05 DEGs – differentially expressed genes, pw – post wounding, RIU – relative intensity unit

Journal: BMC Genomics

Article Title: The role of nitric oxide during embryonic wound healing

doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6147-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Changes in gene expression during wound healing after inhibition of NO production. ( a ) Graphical description of RNA-Seq experiment comparing control and NO inhibited embryonic wound healing. Only the part marked by red rectangle was collected and used for RNA isolation and sequencing. ( b - g ) DEGs, which were identified in RNA-Seq, were grouped based on their expression profile relatively to 0 minutes and GO analysis was performed. ( b , d , f ) Expression profiles of genes are representative of the z-score of the regularized log transformation of the normalized counts. ( c , e , g ) Genes with annotation and human homolog were used for GO analysis. Numbers of analysed genes are in the table together with the representative GO terms for each group. ( h ) RNA-Seq result of lep expression was verified ( i ) using RT-qPCR, separately for nos1 -MO and nos3 -MO. ( j ) Similarly, RNA-Seq result of fos expression was verified using ( k ) RT-qPCR (data are normalized to 0 minutes pw in controls, three replicates, geometric mean with geometric standard deviation, two-sided t-test from log2 values of relative expression between inhibited samples and control in 120 minutes pw), and ( l ) in situ hybridization. Site of injury is marked with a star and the signal where fos is expressed is circled by dot line (Scale bar = 100 μm) (M) Intensity of blue signal around site of injury were measured (one-way Anova, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, minimum 8 replicates). **** - p < .0001, ** - p < .01, * - p < .05, n.s. - p > .05 DEGs – differentially expressed genes, pw – post wounding, RIU – relative intensity unit

Article Snippet: The statistical significance was calculated relative to the control using GraphPad Prism 7 One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Techniques: Gene Expression, Inhibition, RNA Sequencing, Control, Isolation, Sequencing, Expressing, Transformation Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Standard Deviation, In Situ Hybridization

Monitoring of phenotype changes during wound healing in embryos with inhibited NO production. ( a , b , c ) Control embryos, embryos with inhibited production of NO using TRIM 1 hour before injury and embryos injected with mixture of nos1 + nos3 - MO were injured at stage 26 using forceps or needle in the middle and ventral side. ( d ) Laminin layer was visualized at 180 minutes and 360 minutes pw and ends of the laminin layer are marked by a triangle. Formation of “blob” in TRIM embryos is marked by arrow (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( e ) Staining of β- catenin 360 minutes pw (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( f ) Brightfiled image of wound site in 180 minutes pw (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( b , g ) Actin at 30, 60 and 180 minutes pw visualized using green fluorescent phalloidin. Breaks in actin layer are marked by arrow (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( c , h ) Collagen staining at 60 minutes pw. The beginning of the wound is marked by a red triangle. A red arrow marks the end of the collagen layer, while the end of the wound site is marked by a red star. (Scale bar = 100 μm, measurement of coverage of collagen in wound was made from at least six embryos per condition and at least five slices per embryo, one-way anova, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). ( i ) Spatial expression of two matrix metalloproteinases mmp7 and mmp9 was visualized by in situ hybridization in time 360 minutes pw (Scale bars = 500 μm). ( j ) RT-qPCR comparison of temporal expression profiles of mmp1 , mmp8 , mmp7 and mmp9 (data are normalized to 0 minutes pw in controls, three replicates, geometric mean with geometric standard deviation, two-sided ttest from log2 values of relative expression between 360 minutes and 0 minutes). **** - p < .0001, *** - p < .001, ** - p < .01, n.s. - > .05 pw – post wounding

Journal: BMC Genomics

Article Title: The role of nitric oxide during embryonic wound healing

doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6147-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Monitoring of phenotype changes during wound healing in embryos with inhibited NO production. ( a , b , c ) Control embryos, embryos with inhibited production of NO using TRIM 1 hour before injury and embryos injected with mixture of nos1 + nos3 - MO were injured at stage 26 using forceps or needle in the middle and ventral side. ( d ) Laminin layer was visualized at 180 minutes and 360 minutes pw and ends of the laminin layer are marked by a triangle. Formation of “blob” in TRIM embryos is marked by arrow (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( e ) Staining of β- catenin 360 minutes pw (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( f ) Brightfiled image of wound site in 180 minutes pw (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( b , g ) Actin at 30, 60 and 180 minutes pw visualized using green fluorescent phalloidin. Breaks in actin layer are marked by arrow (Scale bar = 100 μm). ( c , h ) Collagen staining at 60 minutes pw. The beginning of the wound is marked by a red triangle. A red arrow marks the end of the collagen layer, while the end of the wound site is marked by a red star. (Scale bar = 100 μm, measurement of coverage of collagen in wound was made from at least six embryos per condition and at least five slices per embryo, one-way anova, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). ( i ) Spatial expression of two matrix metalloproteinases mmp7 and mmp9 was visualized by in situ hybridization in time 360 minutes pw (Scale bars = 500 μm). ( j ) RT-qPCR comparison of temporal expression profiles of mmp1 , mmp8 , mmp7 and mmp9 (data are normalized to 0 minutes pw in controls, three replicates, geometric mean with geometric standard deviation, two-sided ttest from log2 values of relative expression between 360 minutes and 0 minutes). **** - p < .0001, *** - p < .001, ** - p < .01, n.s. - > .05 pw – post wounding

Article Snippet: The statistical significance was calculated relative to the control using GraphPad Prism 7 One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Techniques: Control, Injection, Staining, Expressing, In Situ Hybridization, Quantitative RT-PCR, Comparison, Standard Deviation